“I've made it to Senior – I don't understand what's next or where to look”
The course gives you a roadmap: what a tech lead does, what an architect does, how they differ and how to get there.
Senior → Tech Lead → Architect
Foggy after Senior? There is a path.
AI runs through every module – plus three modules entirely on AI
Find your level. The course takes you further – Middle+ → Senior → Tech Lead → Architect.
You write code with confidence, but you have never put together a large system end to end. AI is everywhere, and how to fit it into the architecture is unclear.
You made it to senior – and beyond that it is fog. You don't want to go into management, and a technical track seems not to exist.
You make decisions but can't justify them – you know intuitively. Your tasks are above your level, and there is no one inside to ask.
This course is not for juniors. Without experience on complex production projects, the material won't land.
What the course solves, based on in-depth interviews with graduates.
“I've made it to Senior – I don't understand what's next or where to look”
The course gives you a roadmap: what a tech lead does, what an architect does, how they differ and how to get there.
You pick a database, queue or cache out of habit or from Stack Overflow.
After the course: 20 database criteria, 13 queues, 17 caches. A systematic choice you can explain to the team and the business.
Technically ready. But with directors, it's a different language.
Module 12: architect communications – how to explain decisions, risk and AI non-determinism to the business.
Agents, RAG and vector databases everywhere. Where the architecture ends and the hype begins is unclear.
AI runs through every module – plus three modules on AI: components and selection criteria, agents and MCP, RAG and serving, designing and auditing architecture with AI. Plus what few people have really figured out: token costs and GPU economics, evals for managing inference quality, model drift, prompt injection and data leaks.
You've read the books, watched the videos, worked on projects. It's all in your head, but it doesn't add up to one picture.
The course systematizes what you already have.
“It felt like I wasn't ready yet.” Or the opposite: “everything has become so easy that I start wondering – maybe I've just stagnated.”
A free consultation with Pavel before you pay and reviews of your own tasks during the course give you an outside assessment of your level – instead of a self-assessment.
Lectures into thin air don't help.
Workshops: we design a URL shortener and work through participants' real tasks. Practice with feedback.
You've been thrown onto a complex project. There's no one at the right level inside the company.
Access to a practicing architect's way of thinking and to the alumni community.
No systematic answer.
Module 12: microservices, monoliths and organizations – when each is chosen and how it relates to how the team is organized.
Pavel has been publishing open content since 2016. Take a look and decide for yourself.
Pavel has been writing since 2016. Articles on architecture, engineer growth and systems thinking. The same level as the course – just shorter. The articles are in Russian.
The Senior glass ceiling – where it comes from and how to break through? How to grow after senior in the AI era – the technical track, no fluff.
With Pavel Veinik, ex-Architect at Miro and EPAM. In Russian, recorded.
12 modules plus a bonus one. 5 parts. Not “what we'll study”, but “what you'll be able to do afterwards”. AI runs through every module – the +AI tag shows exactly where. Plus three modules entirely on AI.
Three packages – choose by your goals and budget. You fill the consultation hours yourself: not all topics will fit, so you and Pavel put the plan together at the first meeting.
$2,600
or 3 payments × $940
$3,500
or 3 payments × $1,250
$4,000
or 3 payments × $1,420
The course gives you the method and group reviews of study tasks. A consultation applies the same method to your real work case, one-on-one with Pavel.
Questions about payment – which country to pay from, installments, company payment and invoices? Message our manager on Telegram →
⚑ 400+ graduates have already completed the course · Run 21
“The most noticeable change after the course is confidence in myself and my decisions.”
I had been following the Technical Leadership course for a long time but kept putting it off: it seemed I wouldn't cope with the amount of material and simply wouldn't be accepted.
“Hard&Soft Skills are the only courses after which you really grow both technically and as a leader.”
I went all the way from the TechLead course to the CTO course and can compare them with programs from other big players on the market.
“I stopped ‘selling ideas’ and started speaking the same language as the business.”
For me, this course was useful not just as a source of new knowledge – it helped me turn the experience I already had into a system and put it to use right away.
“I came to systematize 18 years of experience and gain confidence for pre-sales of architecture solutions – and got exactly what I wanted.”
I came to the course after more than 18 years in IT – to systematize my knowledge and gain confidence for pre-sales of architecture solutions, and got exactly what I wanted. The format of “you read the material yourself whenever it suits you, and…
“A great course that helped me put my accumulated experience in order and learn something new.”
A great course that helped me put my accumulated experience in order and learn something new. A special plus for the AI modules – the breakdown of agent interaction architecture and core principles was very relevant.
“The template really clicked: even when I don't apply it literally, it plays out in my head and shapes how I justify decisions.”
The course met my expectations in exactly what mattered to me – a structured approach to an architect's work, from the client's wishes to the final solution. The template really clicked: even when I don't apply it…
“After the course, architecture decisions stopped being a ‘black box’: I started to understand why a particular choice was made and what the alternatives are.”
The main value of the course for me is systematized architecture knowledge and understanding the reasons behind every decision.
“The course is built to show that technology is not the most important thing.”
The course exceeded my expectations. I came for a deeper dive into system design, but the first parts opened my eyes to things I hadn't paid attention to – gathering requirements, arguing for approaches; and I've already started putting a lot into practice…
A Telegram channel, a cohort chat and an alumni community for life.
An open channel with content. A private chat for participants of the current cohort. Discussions, questions and reviews of architecture tasks while you study.
Subscribe to the channel →A private chat for graduates of all cohorts. Access for life. Ask a question about a real project – people who have walked the same path answer.
“I learn about things I would never have heard of otherwise” – graduate, Tech Lead, Fintech
Announcements of new cohorts, meetups and open sessions. No more than once a month. No spam.
Subscribe to news →Format: you read the material yourself whenever it suits you, and live sessions review it – twice a week, online, recorded. 3 months. 10 hours a week. Sessions are in Russian.
Run 21 has already started – it's no longer possible to join. We'll announce the start of Run 22 soon. Don't wait for the announcement: book a consultation now and find out whether this course is right for you.
The consultation with Pavel is free. It doesn't commit you to anything: it's there so you can understand whether this course is worth it for you and whether it will meet your learning goals. Pavel will help you see your strengths and how you can grow in three months. If the course isn't right for you, he'll tell you so during the consultation and give you individual recommendations.
Still have questions? Message our manager on Telegram →
Hard&Soft Skills · made by engineers for engineers · updated 06 / 2026